Having your Privacy Cake and Eating it Too: Platform-supported Auditing of Social Media Algorithms for Public Interest
Basileal Imana, Aleksandra Korolova and John Heidemann
Citation
Basileal Imana, Aleksandra Korolova and John Heidemann. Having your Privacy Cake and Eating it Too: Platform-supported Auditing of Social Media Algorithms for Public Interest. Technical Report arXiv:2207.08773v2 [cs.CY]. arXiv. [DOI] [PDF] [alt PDF]
Abstract
Social media platforms curate access to information and opportunities, and so play a critical role in shaping public discourse today. The opaque nature of the algorithms these platforms use to curate content raises societal questions. Prior studies have used black-box methods led by experts or collaborative audits driven by everyday users to show that these algorithms can lead to biased or discriminatory outcomes. However, existing auditing methods face fundamental limitations because they function independent of the platforms. Concerns of potential harmful outcomes have prompted proposal of legislation in both the U.S. and the E.U. to mandate a new form of auditing where vetted external researchers get privileged access to social media platforms. Unfortunately, to date there have been no concrete technical proposals to provide such auditing, because auditing at scale risks disclosure of users’ private data and platforms’ proprietary algorithms. We propose a new method for platform-supported auditing that can meet the goals of the proposed legislation. The first contribution of our work is to enumerate the challenges and the limitations of existing auditing methods to implement these policies at scale. Second, we suggest that limited, privileged access to relevance estimators is the key to enabling generalizable platform-supported auditing of social media platforms by external researchers. Third, we show platform-supported auditing need not risk user privacy nor disclosure of platforms’ business interests by proposing an auditing framework that protects against these risks. For a particular fairness metric, we show that ensuring privacy imposes only a small constant factor increase (6.34\times as an upper bound, and 4\times for typical parameters) in the number of samples required for accurate auditing. Our technical contributions, combined with ongoing legal and policy efforts, can enable public oversight into how social media platforms affect individuals and society by moving past the privacy-vs-transparency hurdle.Bibtex Citation
@techreport{Imana22a,
author = {Imana, Basileal and Korolova, Aleksandra and Heidemann, John},
title = {Having your Privacy Cake and Eating it Too: Platform-supported Auditing of Social Media Algorithms for Public Interest},
institution = {arXiv},
year = {2022},
sortdate = {2022-07-18},
project = {ant},
jsubject = {network_observation},
number = {arXiv:2207.08773v2 [cs.CY]},
note = {updated 2023-02-13},
month = jul,
jlocation = {johnh: pafile},
keywords = {linkedin, facebook, ad delivery algorithm, bias,
skew, discrimination, platform-supported auditing,
differential privacy},
doi = {https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2207.08773},
otherurl = {https://arxiv.org/pdf/2207.08773v1.pdf},
url = {https://ant.isi.edu/%7ejohnh/PAPERS/Imana22a.html},
pdfurl = {https://ant.isi.edu/%7ejohnh/PAPERS/Imana22a.pdf},
blogurl = {https://ant.isi.edu/blog/?p=1889}
}